<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Hallie Rubenhold	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://hallierubenhold.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://hallierubenhold.com</link>
	<description>Author &#124; Broadcaster &#124; Historical Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 19:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Venturing into the realm of Jack the Ripper with &#8216;The Five&#8217; by Andrea		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/venturing-into-the-realm-of-jack-the-ripper-with-the-five/#comment-1462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=276#comment-1462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Hallie
Your book &quot;The Five&quot; is very touching. It was a great experience to read it. After 140 years you gave those women justice. Finally. They can rest in peace now. Thank you very much for your very important work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Hallie<br />
Your book &#8220;The Five&#8221; is very touching. It was a great experience to read it. After 140 years you gave those women justice. Finally. They can rest in peace now. Thank you very much for your very important work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Some news&#8230; by Sylvia		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-20</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylvia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/hallie/?p=157#comment-20</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-3&quot;&gt;Kaitlin&lt;/a&gt;.

I loved Mistress of Fate and am looking forward to reading The French Lesson.  Any timeframe for when I nay be able to purchase it in the USA?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-3">Kaitlin</a>.</p>
<p>I loved Mistress of Fate and am looking forward to reading The French Lesson.  Any timeframe for when I nay be able to purchase it in the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by Hallie Rubenhold		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-14</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie Rubenhold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-14</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-12&quot;&gt;Sashbash&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Sasha, I would encourage you to read my book as the TV drama does differ in a number of ways. With regard to the 27 lovers, there is no absolute proof that there were 27 lovers, in fact, the source for this number comes from a letter written by Horace Walpole who was one of the era&#039;s most atrocious gossip mongers. In the course of my research I was only able to trace a handful, and all of these relationships seem to have been initiated by Seymour, not by Sir Richard. Lady Worsley had numerous affairs and Sir Richard either just let her get on with it or actively encouraged his friends (like Deerhurst and Bisset) to have sex with her while he watched. Proof of his voyeurism appears in the trial transcripts and was widely discussed in the press after the trial. In fact, although Lady Worsley was very much trapped in her marriage by the legalities and conventions of her era, she was not passive in her relationship at all. She even attempted to elope with Deerhurst before she met Bisset. A much fuller picture of the dark complexities of their marriage is discussed in my book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-12">Sashbash</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Sasha, I would encourage you to read my book as the TV drama does differ in a number of ways. With regard to the 27 lovers, there is no absolute proof that there were 27 lovers, in fact, the source for this number comes from a letter written by Horace Walpole who was one of the era&#8217;s most atrocious gossip mongers. In the course of my research I was only able to trace a handful, and all of these relationships seem to have been initiated by Seymour, not by Sir Richard. Lady Worsley had numerous affairs and Sir Richard either just let her get on with it or actively encouraged his friends (like Deerhurst and Bisset) to have sex with her while he watched. Proof of his voyeurism appears in the trial transcripts and was widely discussed in the press after the trial. In fact, although Lady Worsley was very much trapped in her marriage by the legalities and conventions of her era, she was not passive in her relationship at all. She even attempted to elope with Deerhurst before she met Bisset. A much fuller picture of the dark complexities of their marriage is discussed in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by Sashbash		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-12</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sashbash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-12</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have just watched this with my sister and husband and we are fascinated to know the truth behind the story. Having just read a few articles, there does not seem to be tangible evidence of voyeurism beyond the bath house; was that the case and artistic licence took you to believe the other 26 lovers were also embroiled with Sir Richard&#039;s deviant practices? Or do we have further evidence that they were all arranged by him? 
Very enjoyable and watchable programme, excellent entertainment. Strong characters, although George Bisset a bit weak; we felt it sad he left her after all she went through, unless, in fact, they were all her lovers, in which case understandable!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just watched this with my sister and husband and we are fascinated to know the truth behind the story. Having just read a few articles, there does not seem to be tangible evidence of voyeurism beyond the bath house; was that the case and artistic licence took you to believe the other 26 lovers were also embroiled with Sir Richard&#8217;s deviant practices? Or do we have further evidence that they were all arranged by him?<br />
Very enjoyable and watchable programme, excellent entertainment. Strong characters, although George Bisset a bit weak; we felt it sad he left her after all she went through, unless, in fact, they were all her lovers, in which case understandable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by sunny16		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-11</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunny16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-11</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks so much for your reply Hallie. I also see and agree with your perspective - have the book and starting it now. I&#039;m looking forward to reading it and will be interesting for me to see where my view lands up on Lady Worsley.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for your reply Hallie. I also see and agree with your perspective &#8211; have the book and starting it now. I&#8217;m looking forward to reading it and will be interesting for me to see where my view lands up on Lady Worsley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by Hallie Rubenhold		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-10</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie Rubenhold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-10</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-7&quot;&gt;sunny16&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi, I understand your point of view and I think it&#039;s valid for women to look to a woman in the past who stood up for herself and admire her strength and determination in doing what she did and going against the grain. Lady Worsley was all of that, but we&#039;re applying the term &#039;feminist&#039; to her retrospectively and we must tread carefully here. The question is, what does &#039;feminist&#039; mean to us in the 21st century? It&#039;s very easy to arrive at a set of assumptions that are uniquely 21st century and then assume people in the past also adhered to these ideals, notions and aspirations, when more often than not they didn&#039;t. I would also offer a caveat which is that the Lady Worsley depicted on screen and the &#039;real&#039; Lady Worsley (who I write about) were different people. I would urge you to read my book before deciding exactly who and what she was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-7">sunny16</a>.</p>
<p>Hi, I understand your point of view and I think it&#8217;s valid for women to look to a woman in the past who stood up for herself and admire her strength and determination in doing what she did and going against the grain. Lady Worsley was all of that, but we&#8217;re applying the term &#8216;feminist&#8217; to her retrospectively and we must tread carefully here. The question is, what does &#8216;feminist&#8217; mean to us in the 21st century? It&#8217;s very easy to arrive at a set of assumptions that are uniquely 21st century and then assume people in the past also adhered to these ideals, notions and aspirations, when more often than not they didn&#8217;t. I would also offer a caveat which is that the Lady Worsley depicted on screen and the &#8216;real&#8217; Lady Worsley (who I write about) were different people. I would urge you to read my book before deciding exactly who and what she was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by Hallie Rubenhold		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-9</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie Rubenhold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-9</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-5&quot;&gt;Bryan James&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Bryan,
Naturally there were always going to be some differences between a 90 min TV version of Lady Worsley&#039;s story and the historical telling of it in my book. It&#039;s very difficult to distill the complexities of the Worsleys&#039; tale into that medium and limited frame of time. You&#039;ll see in my book that neither Lady Worsley nor Sir Richard are entirely sympathetic, which is what makes them fascinating. You&#039;ll also find that Lady Worsley was an active and willing participant in her sexual encounters with other men and she continued to carry on her affairs with them even when Sir Richard wasn&#039;t present. She also tried to elope with Lord Deerhurst long before she met Bisset.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-5">Bryan James</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Bryan,<br />
Naturally there were always going to be some differences between a 90 min TV version of Lady Worsley&#8217;s story and the historical telling of it in my book. It&#8217;s very difficult to distill the complexities of the Worsleys&#8217; tale into that medium and limited frame of time. You&#8217;ll see in my book that neither Lady Worsley nor Sir Richard are entirely sympathetic, which is what makes them fascinating. You&#8217;ll also find that Lady Worsley was an active and willing participant in her sexual encounters with other men and she continued to carry on her affairs with them even when Sir Richard wasn&#8217;t present. She also tried to elope with Lord Deerhurst long before she met Bisset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Some news&#8230; by Hallie Rubenhold		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-8</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallie Rubenhold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/hallie/?p=157#comment-8</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-3&quot;&gt;Kaitlin&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Kaitlin,
Thanks for getting in touch. The French Lesson will be published in the UK in March 2016. Due to various issues with my North American publisher a US/Canadian publication date has not yet been determined, however you should be able to buy the French Lesson from a UK distributor when it&#039;s available.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://hallierubenhold.com/usa-and-canada/some-news/#comment-3">Kaitlin</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Kaitlin,<br />
Thanks for getting in touch. The French Lesson will be published in the UK in March 2016. Due to various issues with my North American publisher a US/Canadian publication date has not yet been determined, however you should be able to buy the French Lesson from a UK distributor when it&#8217;s available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by sunny16		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-7</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunny16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-7</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for bringing this story to all of us - it&#039;s a great historical gem. I see what you&#039;re saying re: Lady Worsley and feminism, but I think that as a woman who was pursuing her own aims, at a time many women weren&#039;t, she&#039;d fall under the term &quot;feminist&quot; in a loose way. There is a thread that has continued into our times, where women can still relate to a courageousness in her actions and an independence because there&#039;s still a relevance to it in this day. Being a woman didn&#039;t seem to fully deter her from pursuing her own needs, her own aims (even if those needs involved being entangled in a battle with her husband - Sir Richard, to get/protect what was hers, and even if they involved a drive/desire for retribution ). Yes, looking back on it some may now use the term &#039;feminist&#039;, while Lady Worsley would not  - however, she did break through &#039;norms&#039; in pursuing what she needed to, wanted to, and didn&#039;t let the fact she was a woman and the expectations that came along with that at that time, wholly stand in her way - I think this where the feminist association comes in. I personally don&#039;t think she needed to be an activist, fight for woman&#039;s rights, or have had loftier aims, to be associated with the word &#039;feminist&#039;. It&#039;s more along the lines of  being a woman pursuing what she felt she needed to, at that time and in that context, where I can understand the tie-in of that term for her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for bringing this story to all of us &#8211; it&#8217;s a great historical gem. I see what you&#8217;re saying re: Lady Worsley and feminism, but I think that as a woman who was pursuing her own aims, at a time many women weren&#8217;t, she&#8217;d fall under the term &#8220;feminist&#8221; in a loose way. There is a thread that has continued into our times, where women can still relate to a courageousness in her actions and an independence because there&#8217;s still a relevance to it in this day. Being a woman didn&#8217;t seem to fully deter her from pursuing her own needs, her own aims (even if those needs involved being entangled in a battle with her husband &#8211; Sir Richard, to get/protect what was hers, and even if they involved a drive/desire for retribution ). Yes, looking back on it some may now use the term &#8216;feminist&#8217;, while Lady Worsley would not  &#8211; however, she did break through &#8216;norms&#8217; in pursuing what she needed to, wanted to, and didn&#8217;t let the fact she was a woman and the expectations that came along with that at that time, wholly stand in her way &#8211; I think this where the feminist association comes in. I personally don&#8217;t think she needed to be an activist, fight for woman&#8217;s rights, or have had loftier aims, to be associated with the word &#8216;feminist&#8217;. It&#8217;s more along the lines of  being a woman pursuing what she felt she needed to, at that time and in that context, where I can understand the tie-in of that term for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Raising the Dead &#8211; an author&#8217;s view on resurrecting Lady Worsley for TV by Bryan James		</title>
		<link>https://hallierubenhold.com/television-and-film/raising-the-dead-an-authors-view-on-resurrecting-lady-worsley-for-tv/#comment-5</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hallierubenhold.com/?p=235#comment-5</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re your prayer; it would be interesting to hear what you thought of  the finished film? I found it interesting and watchable. I wondered from time to time if, like the famous dodgy document, it had been sexed-up somewhat? There seemed an awful lot of it and I wasn&#039;t sure how much was based on the book and how much might have been from &#039;editorial choices&#039;.

Lady Worsley was ultimately not a very sympathetic character and certainly, in her attitude to doing whatever her husband desired sexualy, was no feminist - as we understand the term today, at least. You could say she was &#039;liberated&#039; in that she seemed to have little regard for convention and the confidence to go against it. However if &#039;she&#039; had been a &#039;he&#039;, would there have been such focus on the bedroom in this telling of the tale? But perhaps there wouldn&#039;t have been a scandal in that case.

I can&#039;t help feeling that this was glossy sexed-up version of her life and some way from the whole truth. None the less interesting for it but perhpas not as rounded as suggested in your article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re your prayer; it would be interesting to hear what you thought of  the finished film? I found it interesting and watchable. I wondered from time to time if, like the famous dodgy document, it had been sexed-up somewhat? There seemed an awful lot of it and I wasn&#8217;t sure how much was based on the book and how much might have been from &#8216;editorial choices&#8217;.</p>
<p>Lady Worsley was ultimately not a very sympathetic character and certainly, in her attitude to doing whatever her husband desired sexualy, was no feminist &#8211; as we understand the term today, at least. You could say she was &#8216;liberated&#8217; in that she seemed to have little regard for convention and the confidence to go against it. However if &#8216;she&#8217; had been a &#8216;he&#8217;, would there have been such focus on the bedroom in this telling of the tale? But perhaps there wouldn&#8217;t have been a scandal in that case.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help feeling that this was glossy sexed-up version of her life and some way from the whole truth. None the less interesting for it but perhpas not as rounded as suggested in your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
